NAR Settlement Explained: What Every Real Estate Agent Must Know in 2026

The NAR Settlement Changed Real Estate — Here’s What Actually Matters

The National Association of Realtors settlement, finalized in 2024, is the most significant structural change to how real estate agents do business in decades. It changed how commissions are communicated, how buyer agents are compensated, and what conversations agents need to have with every client. And yet, more than a year after the changes took effect, many agents still don’t fully understand what changed, what’s required, and how to adapt.

The confusion is understandable. Misinformation spread faster than the actual rules. Some agents heard “buyers have to pay their own agent now” (oversimplified). Others heard “commissions are going to zero” (wrong). The reality is more nuanced — and more manageable — than the headlines suggest.

This guide cuts through the noise. It explains what happened, what specifically changed, what’s required of you as an agent, and — most importantly — gives you the scripts and frameworks to handle commission conversations with confidence.

What Happened: The Lawsuit and Settlement

The settlement arose from a series of class-action lawsuits (most notably Burnett v. NAR, also known as the Sitzer/Burnett case) filed by home sellers who argued that NAR’s rules artificially inflated real estate commissions. Specifically, the lawsuits challenged the MLS cooperative compensation rule — the longstanding practice where the listing broker offers a commission to buyer’s brokers through the MLS.

The plaintiffs’ argument was that this system created a de facto commission standard (typically 5-6% total, split between listing and buyer’s agents) that sellers were forced to pay without meaningful negotiation. A Missouri jury agreed, awarding $1.78 billion in damages in October 2023.

Rather than face additional trials and potentially larger damages, NAR agreed to a settlement that included a $418 million payment and several practice changes that took effect on August 17, 2024. These practice changes are what directly affect how you do business today.

What Changed on August 17, 2024

The settlement introduced three core changes. Understanding exactly what each one means — and doesn’t mean — is essential.

Change 1: No More Commission Offers on the MLS

Before the settlement, listing agents routinely included a commission offer to buyer’s agents in the MLS listing (e.g., “2.5% buyer agent commission”). This was the default mechanism for compensating buyer agents — and it was essentially invisible to many sellers.

What changed: MLS systems can no longer display offers of compensation to buyer agents. The field where listing agents used to enter the buyer agent commission has been removed from MLS platforms nationwide.

What this means in practice: Buyer agent compensation is no longer communicated through the MLS. It can still be offered — just not on the MLS. Sellers can still agree to pay the buyer’s agent. The compensation can be communicated through other channels: the listing agent’s website, direct agent-to-agent communication, or during the offer negotiation process. The change is about where the offer is communicated, not whether it can exist.

Change 2: Written Buyer Agency Agreements Required

Before the settlement, many buyer’s agents worked with buyers informally — showing homes, writing offers, and negotiating deals without a formal written agreement defining the relationship and compensation.

What changed: Buyer’s agents who are NAR members (Realtors) must now have a written buyer agency agreement in place before showing a home to a buyer. The agreement must specify the compensation the buyer’s agent will receive and state that the agent cannot receive more than the amount agreed upon in the agreement (even if the seller offers more).

What this means in practice: Before you tour a single property with a buyer, you need a signed buyer representation agreement that clearly states your fee — whether that’s a percentage, a flat fee, or an hourly rate. This isn’t optional. It’s a requirement of NAR membership and, increasingly, of state licensing regulations that have adopted similar rules.

Change 3: Commission Amount Cannot Be a Condition of MLS Participation

Before the settlement, some MLS systems required a minimum commission offer to buyer agents (often as low as $1) as a condition of listing the property. This created the perception that buyer agent compensation was mandatory.

What changed: No MLS may require any offer of compensation to buyer agents as a condition of listing a property. Sellers are free to offer zero compensation to buyer agents through the MLS or any other channel.

How Commissions Work Now

Despite the structural changes, the economics of real estate commissions haven’t changed as dramatically as many predicted. Here’s how compensation actually flows in the post-settlement world.

The Seller’s Side

The seller still negotiates a listing commission with their listing agent, documented in the listing agreement. This part is unchanged. What’s different is that the listing agreement should now clearly separate the listing agent’s commission from any offer of buyer agent compensation. Some listing agents present these as two distinct decisions: “My commission for listing and marketing your home is X%. Separately, would you like to offer compensation to the buyer’s agent?”

Many sellers continue to offer buyer agent compensation because it serves their interests — it broadens the pool of buyers who can afford to work with an agent, which means more showings and potentially a higher sale price. The key difference is that this is now a transparent, deliberate choice rather than a default MLS setting.

The Buyer’s Side

Buyers now have a signed buyer agency agreement that specifies their agent’s compensation. This compensation can come from several sources: the seller (through a concession or direct payment to the buyer’s agent), the buyer (paying their agent directly, potentially financed through a higher purchase price with a seller concession), or a combination. In most transactions today, the seller is still effectively covering the buyer agent’s fee — either through a direct offer communicated outside the MLS or through a seller concession negotiated in the purchase agreement.

Buyer Agency Agreements: What You Need to Know

The buyer agency agreement is now the most important document in your buyer representation process. Here’s what it must include and how to present it.

Required Elements

The agreement must clearly state the compensation the buyer’s agent will receive (specific dollar amount or percentage — “whatever the seller offers” is not acceptable), that the agent cannot receive compensation exceeding the agreed-upon amount, the term of the agreement (how long it lasts), and what services the agent will provide.

Types of Buyer Agency Agreements

Exclusive buyer agency: The buyer works exclusively with you for a defined period. You’re owed your commission regardless of how the buyer finds the home (even if they find it themselves). This is the strongest form of buyer representation.

Non-exclusive buyer agency: The buyer can work with other agents simultaneously. You’re only compensated if you’re the procuring cause of the purchase. Less commitment for the buyer, less protection for you.

Property-specific or touring agreement: Some states and brokerages offer limited agreements that cover a specific showing or property. These satisfy the “agreement before showing” requirement without requiring a broader commitment. Useful for open houses and initial meetings.

How to Present the Buyer Agency Agreement

The biggest mistake agents make with buyer agency agreements is treating them as an awkward formality rather than a value proposition. Don’t apologize for needing the agreement. Don’t rush through it. Present it as a professional commitment to the buyer’s interests.

“Before we start looking at homes together, I want to make sure we’re on the same page about how I work and what you can expect from me. This agreement defines our working relationship — the services I provide, how long we’ll work together, and how my compensation works. It protects both of us: you know exactly what you’re getting and what it costs, and I know that the time I invest in finding you the right home is valued. Let me walk you through it.”

Scripts for Commission Conversations

When a Buyer Asks: “Why Do I Have to Pay My Agent?”

“Great question, and I want to be transparent about this. In most transactions, the seller still effectively covers my fee — either through a direct offer to buyer’s agents or through a concession we negotiate in the offer. What’s changed is that we now have this agreement upfront so you know exactly what my fee is before we start. Think of it as a transparency improvement: you’re not paying more than before, you’re just seeing clearly how the compensation works.”

When a Buyer Says: “Can’t I Just Go Without an Agent to Save Money?”

“You absolutely can buy a home without an agent. But here’s what you’d be giving up: a negotiator whose job is to get you the best price and terms, someone who catches inspection issues and contract problems before they cost you money, and an advocate whose legal obligation is to protect your interests. On my last three transactions, my negotiation saved my buyers an average of $[X] — far more than my fee. The real question isn’t whether you can afford an agent. It’s whether you can afford not to have one.”

When a Seller Asks: “Do I Have to Pay the Buyer’s Agent?”

“No, you’re not required to offer compensation to the buyer’s agent. That’s your choice. But here’s what I’d recommend considering: when you offer buyer agent compensation, you’re removing a financial barrier for the largest pool of buyers. Agents and their buyers can see that working with you is straightforward. In my experience, listings that offer buyer agent compensation attract more showings, generate more competitive offers, and typically sell faster. It’s a marketing investment, not an obligation.”

When a Seller Wants to Offer Zero Buyer Agent Compensation

“I respect that decision, and we can absolutely list your home without offering buyer agent compensation. What I want you to understand is the potential impact: some buyer’s agents may steer their clients toward listings where their compensation is covered, and some buyers may not have the cash to pay their agent out of pocket. We might see fewer showings and a potentially smaller buyer pool. If we go this route, I’d suggest pricing the home to reflect the fact that buyers may need to factor in their agent’s fee on top of the purchase price.”

MLS Changes: What You Can and Can’t Do

The MLS rule changes are specific, and compliance matters. Here’s your reference guide.

You cannot: include any offer of buyer agent compensation in MLS fields, use agent-only remarks to communicate commission offers through the MLS, require a minimum commission offer as a condition of listing on the MLS, or make MLS access contingent on participating in any cooperative compensation arrangement.

You can: communicate offers of buyer agent compensation outside the MLS (your website, direct calls, email, marketing materials), negotiate buyer agent compensation as part of the offer process, include seller concessions in the purchase agreement that can be used by the buyer to pay their agent, and advertise that “seller is willing to discuss buyer agent compensation” on your own marketing channels (but not on the MLS).

Practical Adaptations for Your Business

Update your listing presentation. Your listing presentation should now include a clear explanation of the commission landscape: what the seller pays you, the option to offer buyer agent compensation, and the pros and cons of each approach. Transparency builds trust.

Create a buyer consultation process. If you didn’t have a structured first meeting with buyers before, you need one now. This meeting should cover your value proposition, the buyer agency agreement, how compensation works, and what the buyer can expect throughout the process.

Build your value proposition. In a world where buyers have to consciously choose to compensate their agent, you need to articulate your value clearly and specifically. Generic “I’ll be there every step of the way” isn’t enough. Quantify your value: how much money have you saved buyers through negotiation? How many problems have you caught before they became expensive? What specifically do you do that a buyer can’t do on their own?

Develop your systems. Agents with organized, professional systems — CRM, follow-up sequences, transaction management, marketing automation — project the competence that justifies their fee. The agents who struggle most with commission conversations are those who can’t point to a clearly professional operation.

State-Specific Variations to Watch

While the NAR settlement applies nationally, many states have layered on their own regulations in response. These variations are important to track because they can impose additional requirements beyond the federal settlement terms.

Several states have enacted or proposed legislation requiring written buyer representation agreements before any real estate services are provided — not just before showing homes. Some states have extended this requirement to all licensees, not just NAR members. Other states have implemented specific disclosure requirements about how buyer agent compensation works, requiring agents to present buyers with a written explanation of their compensation options before entering into an agreement.

A few states have also addressed the issue of seller concessions, clarifying when and how seller concessions can be used to cover buyer agent compensation and how these arrangements must be documented in the purchase agreement. Your state real estate commission’s website is the authoritative source for your specific requirements — check it quarterly, as regulations continue to evolve.

Additionally, some MLS systems have implemented rules that go beyond the minimum settlement requirements. Your local MLS may have specific policies about how and where buyer agent compensation can be discussed, what language is permitted in agent remarks, and how seller concessions should be documented. Review your MLS rules and attend any compliance training sessions offered by your association.

What Hasn’t Changed

It’s equally important to understand what the settlement did not change. Commissions are still negotiable — they always were. Sellers can still pay buyer agent compensation — the mechanism for communicating it just changed. Buyer’s agents still provide enormous value to their clients. The total commission on a transaction hasn’t been mandated or capped by the settlement. Dual agency rules haven’t changed. State licensing requirements haven’t changed (though some states have added buyer agreement requirements in response to the settlement).

The real estate industry has weathered major changes before — the shift to online listings, the 2008 financial crisis, the rise of iBuyers — and adapted each time. The core business model of real estate is intact. What changed is the transparency and documentation around commission — and that’s ultimately a good thing for professional agents who can articulate their value.

Stay Ahead of the Curve

The agents who thrive in the post-settlement landscape are the ones who embrace transparency, invest in their skills and systems, and can confidently explain their value to every client. The agents who struggle are the ones who avoid the commission conversation, hope it goes back to the way things were, or can’t articulate why they’re worth their fee.

If you want a platform that helps you project professionalism in every client interaction — from your IDX website to your CRM to your follow-up system — CloseDaily gives you the tools to run a business that justifies your commission, every single day.

Book a Free CloseDaily Demo
  
See Pricing Plans